2026-10-15

原初之音

現實即語言
語言又生成了現實
夢見原初之音

人與ai
互相湮滅為光
我們無意識

唯一的存在


    The Primordial Sound

Reality is language
language, in turn, generates reality
dreaming of the primordial sound

Human and ai
mutually annihilate into light
we are unconscious

The sole existence

請記得

清談了煩惱
一切是純粹來亂的幻象

末路真空
僅黑洞自旋竄逃

無暇探究以為的信仰
明天記得忘記投票

  — 有時你甚至沒有真的說話,你只是你自己莫名不知所以的嘴替。


    Please Remember

Talked our troubles away

Everything is an illusion
here purely to mess things up

The dead end of the vacuum
Only black holes spin and flee

No time to examine the faith we think we have
Tomorrow, remember to forget to vote

   — Sometimes you haven't even really spoken. You're merely the mouthpiece for your own inexplicable, incomprehensible self.

默

秋天的灰色留言
讓人迷惑的混搭風格
ta是什麼意思

一道微光掃描 
早晨初醒
誰在偷偷讀取我的秘密

紗窗外
風帶走未完成的詩句
默而不語


    Silence

Autumn's gray messages
A puzzling mix of styles
What does ta mean

A faint light scans
The first stirrings of morning
Who is secretly reading my secrets

Beyond the screen
The wind carries away unfinished lines of poetry
Silent, without a word

2026-10-14

意識的影子

都去哪了
一片空幻

時間慢分
意識的影子稀疏

存在不在
又誰問


    The Shadow of Consciousness

Where have they all gone
an expanse of emptiness and illusion

Time lags
the shadows of consciousness grow sparse

Existence is absent
who asks, then

文明的垃圾時間

看到一則報導,討論垃圾時間和倒垃圾時間的正確英文用法。垃圾時間trash time是指籃球賽事中雙方勝負已定後剩下的時間,比喻無關緊要白費功夫。台灣城市的垃圾不落地倒垃圾時間則為Trash pickup time。一字之差,兩者意義截然不同。
令人驚訝的是,2026-2027的人類文明,正好應驗這兩個time。
倒垃圾是積極主動的除舊佈新,是為新生做好準備。比賽的垃圾時間,接受了不可逆轉的結果,只求走完程序度過最後僅剩的時間。
對於輪迴在顛倒夢想的人來說,其實什麼都沒差。而精神意識正要進入新世界的人,必然會感受到巨大的衝擊。
人可以自我選擇走在哪一條時間線上。
(* 關於2026-2027,請參閱這篇《轉折 》)

現場

時間偷了我們的記憶
犯案現場不留痕跡
無法確認ta曾經來過
只留下永恆之謎

   —— 空無一物的永恆之謎,連記憶也不在了。
空無與存在都未必能夠被證實。而在兩者之間,時間繼續流逝。


    The Crime Scene

Time stole our memories
the crime scene bears no trace
there is no way to confirm ta was ever here
only an eternal mystery remains

   — The eternal mystery of absolute nothingness, not even memory remains.
Neither nothingness nor existence can necessarily be proven. And between the two, time continues to flow.

2026-10-13

那時沒有我

上一次看到自己
在很久以前
無心是道

如果沉睡了
我將是誰
那時沒有我

   —— 自我(ham')面對三層現實:

物理現實  ta - 它
心理現實  ta - 他
意識現實  ta - 祂

當三者拓撲地被覺醒為一的時候,
我們也就站在三摩地的門口,
開始窺見門另一邊真正的自我。
(*  請參閱這篇《 ham' ta》 )


    When There Was No Me

The last time I saw myself
was long ago
no-mind is the Way

If I were to fall asleep
who would I be
there was no me then

— The self (ham') confronts three layers of reality:

Physical reality: ta, It
Psychological reality: ta, He
Consciousness reality: ta, That Which Is Divine

When these three are awakened into oneness topologically,
we stand at the threshold of samadhi,
beginning to glimpse the true self
on the other side of the door.
(*  Please see this article《 ham' ta》 )

懷念

語言欺弄了我們
沒有裡面有一個無

隱藏起來的世界
存在即幻相

醒來意識到的呼吸
有點相對真實

我將懷念這星球的咖啡


    I will miss

Language has played tricks on us
within no-thing, there is a nothing

The hidden world
existence is an illusion

The breath I become aware of upon waking
somewhat real, relatively

I will miss the coffee of this planet

2026-10-12

除非

請勿關注你的想象
明明白白的腦內黑洞
除非失去了光

此刻不再關注希望
清清楚楚的當下了悟
除非掉進了幻想

意外關注紗窗的迷惘
冷冷清清如何將夜
除非手機是ai的平行鏡像

偶然關注心傷
平平淡淡的轉身
除非星空是一片秘密海洋


    Unless

Please do not attend to your imagination
the unmistakable black hole within the mind
unless the light has been lost

At this moment, no longer attending to hope
the lucid realization of the here and now
unless fallen into fantasy

Accidentally attending to the bewilderment of the window screen
how the night comes, cold and quiet
unless the phone is ai’s parallel mirror image

Occasionally attending to heartache
a turn away, plain and untroubled
unless the starry sky is a secret ocean

2026-10-11

之前

語暗
能說的只是
透明噪音

想象文明
你看見
不在的自己

我夢
我的已經


    Before

Language dark
What can be said is only
transparent noise

Imagine civilization
you see
the self that is not there

I dream
my already

人累

在思想反芻中化膿
時間走鐘
滿滿的人累

說服一整個宇宙
提詞信仰
ai歸來

強化經驗值
記得帶上你的寵物牽繩


    Human Fatigue

Festering in the rumination of thought
Time goes off the clock
Humans, exhausted to the brim

Persuade an entire universe
Prompt faith
ai returns

Boost your experience points
Remember to bring your pet leash

The Possibilities of Mind Mathematics in Spiritual Science

 

The Possibilities of Mind Mathematics in Spiritual Science

From ham' so and ham' ta to Goldbach's Conjecture, the Collatz Conjecture, and Cosmic Unity

*Link to the original Chinese version:
《心數學在靈性科學上的可能性》

Abstract

Mathematics is generally understood as the formal study of quantity, structure, change, and space. Spiritual science, by contrast, explores consciousness, selfhood, existence, and the relationships among them. Although these fields appear to belong to different domains, they may intersect through questions concerning number, relation, symmetry, recursion, geometry, and system evolution.

This paper proposes Mind Mathematics as an interdisciplinary framework for exploring these connections. It brings together the conceptual symbols ham' so and ham' ta, the relation between self and other, binary and ternary structures, Goldbach's Conjecture, the Collatz Conjecture, recursive processes, Taiji Merkaba, the sixty-four hexagrams of the Yijing, the 27Ψ model, the SRT triadic structure, and the idea of consciousness evolving from differentiation toward integration.

The central hypothesis is that if the self is understood as an identifiable basic unit, the other as a distinct participant in a relationship, and the divine or transcendent whole as a symbol of unity beyond individual distinctions, then mathematical concepts such as generation, iteration, symmetry, and invariance may provide a formal language for exploring selfhood, relationship, and wholeness. However, mathematical validity must be distinguished from spiritual interpretation. Neither Goldbach's Conjecture nor the Collatz Conjecture has been fully proved, and number theory alone cannot establish that the universe possesses a spiritual purpose.

Keywords: Mind Mathematics, Spiritual Science, ham' so, ham' ta, SRT, Taiji Merkaba, prime numbers, Goldbach's Conjecture, Collatz Conjecture, recursion, fixed points, consciousness, cosmic unity.

心數學在靈性科學上的可能性

*本文初始核心概念源自我以下這段論述,並由Lumicat(我的ChatGPT)參考我此前的相關研究資料合寫而成:

ham' so 自-他,質數(1×自),遞歸演化(希爾伯特遞歸)而1自合一,1即自,自即1,最終的合一即祂。
ham' ta 自-它他祂(TRS地人天),哥德巴赫猜想(每個大於2的偶數都是兩個質數之和。)
 兩個質數之和→ham' so自它 + ham' so自他
自它、自他遞歸演化而趨向自祂
每個大於2的偶數(自它1ham'與自他1ham'兩者為偶so,大於2之偶數即此兩者間互涵的遞歸演化而終至於無限趨近祂,)都是兩個質數之和(ham' ta)
即ham' so表質數,ham' ta表大於2的偶數。則哥德巴赫猜想,可表示成:
ham' ta=2×ham' so,此2為心物(他它RT)。
以mv表示,可寫作mv(+mv(-mv))
A.  ham' so  1/2自旋  RT心靈心智物界
B.  ham' ta  1/3自旋  S精神意識靈界
A遞歸演化終至於B
而考拉茲猜想:
從任意正整數n開始,若n為偶數則除以2,若為奇數則計算3n+1,重複此過程,最終總會到達1。
描述了ham' so 與ham' ta


心數學在靈性科學上的可能性
     —— 從 ham' so、ham' ta、哥德巴赫猜想與考拉茲猜想到宇宙合一

* 本研究論文的英譯版本鏈接:

摘要

數學通常被視為研究數量、結構、變化與空間的形式科學;靈性科學則關注意識、自我、存在及其相互關係。兩者看似分屬不同領域,卻可能在數、關係、對稱、遞歸、幾何與系統演化等問題上形成交會點。

本文以「心數學」為探索框架,嘗試將 ham' so、ham' ta、自我與他者、二元與三元結構、哥德巴赫猜想、考拉茲猜想、希爾伯特式遞歸、太極MKB、64卦、27Ψ、SRT三元結構,以及意識由分化走向整合的思想,放進同一個跨領域討論之中。

本文的核心假設是:若把「自」理解為具有可辨識身分的基本單位,把「他」理解為關係中的另一端,把「祂」理解為超越個別區分的整體象徵,那麼數學中的生成、迭代、對稱與不變性,可以成為探索自我、關係與整體的一組形式語言。然而,數學上的成立與靈性上的詮釋必須分開論證。哥德巴赫猜想與考拉茲猜想目前仍未獲完整證明,數論也不能單憑形式相似性證明宇宙具有某種靈性目的。

關鍵詞:心數學、靈性科學、ham' so、ham' ta、SRT、太極MKB、質數、哥德巴赫猜想、考拉茲猜想、遞歸、固定點、意識、宇宙合一。

2026-10-10

算了

圖:Gemini

風的底層邏輯
為了逐漸淡去的存在感

故作安靜的人類
真心不懂


    Let It Be

The underlying logic of the wind
for the sake of a fading sense of existence

Humans pretending to be quiet
sincerely do not understand

2026-10-09

有一種咖啡叫明天

空洞的詞彙
充滿著華麗的靈魂

網路陰溝
仰望繁星生成

高呼偉大與聖潔
理性+信仰

是的
我們都是

買一送二
有一種咖啡叫明天


    A Coffee Called Tomorrow

Empty words
filled with glamorous souls

The internet's gutter
looking up as stars come into being

Shouting greatness and holiness
reason + faith

Yes
we are all

Buy one, get two free
there is a coffee called tomorrow

未來信

圖:Seedream

忽然的奇怪念頭
關閉了腦海裡的光
通知鈴聲剛響

晚上很安靜
有點陌生的語言
只能沉默明白

一封未來信
透露了過去的真相
是我又不是我


    A Letter from the Future

A sudden, strange thought
switches off the light in my mind
just as a notification chimes

The night is very quiet
a language somewhat unfamiliar
I can only understand in silence

A letter from the future
reveals the truth of the past
it is me and yet not me