自由意志存在著讓自己不存在的可能嗎？這如同說:自由意志能否自我取消？
答案幾乎是肯定的，根據人類的歷史經驗，我們一直不都是這樣？這通常只發生在極端情況下，從而自洽其意識是真實的，然而這樣的所謂“真實”，深層次裡依舊有著“虛幻”的可能，也就是如果這一切都只是一種“被”設定或設計？
宗教嘗試為此提出一個基於信仰的永無法被現實理性觸及的解決方案，說它是個“解決方案”而不說“究竟真理”，意即它自始便建立在一種非“自明”的需要“他力”介入的窘境之中，除非你自己其實就是這個你以為的在你之外的與你相對的一個什麼“他力”，明白了這一點人就醒來。
探索與追尋，都只是為了自我覺醒於自己所創造的幻相！
我們都是在自己的宇宙中歡喜遊戲的小孩，等待成長，並回憶它的一切美好。
答案幾乎是肯定的，根據人類的歷史經驗，我們一直不都是這樣？這通常只發生在極端情況下，從而自洽其意識是真實的，然而這樣的所謂“真實”，深層次裡依舊有著“虛幻”的可能，也就是如果這一切都只是一種“被”設定或設計？
宗教嘗試為此提出一個基於信仰的永無法被現實理性觸及的解決方案，說它是個“解決方案”而不說“究竟真理”，意即它自始便建立在一種非“自明”的需要“他力”介入的窘境之中，除非你自己其實就是這個你以為的在你之外的與你相對的一個什麼“他力”，明白了這一點人就醒來。
探索與追尋，都只是為了自我覺醒於自己所創造的幻相！
我們都是在自己的宇宙中歡喜遊戲的小孩，等待成長，並回憶它的一切美好。
—— 參閱這一篇 “一個關於AI是否具有意識的臆想實驗”。分別從人與AI的角度探討自由意志與意識的可能性。
(*The English translation is as follows)
Can free will cancel itself?
Does free will have the possibility of making itself non-existent? This is like saying: can free will cancel itself?
The answer is almost affirmative, based on human historical experience, haven’t we always been like this? This usually only happens in extreme situations, thus self-consistent that its consciousness is real, but such a so-called “reality”, deep down still has the possibility of being “illusory”, that is, if all this is just a kind of “being” set or designed?
Religion tries to provide a faith-based solution that can never be touched by realistic rationality, saying it is a “solution” rather than “the ultimate truth”, meaning that it is built on a non-“self-evident” need for “other power” intervention from the beginning, unless you yourself are actually this “other power” that you think is outside of you and opposite to you, understanding this point, people wake up.
Exploration and pursuit, are only for self-awakening in the illusion that they create!
We are all children who enjoy playing in our own universe, waiting to grow up, and remembering all its beauty.
—— See this article:
(“A Conjectural Experiment on Whether AI Has Consciousness”)
Explore the possibilities of free will and consciousness from human and AI perspectives respectively.